New York, NY (PRWEB) February 17, 2015
Persistent unpredictability describes the current state of operative HIEs according to the 86% of healthcare providers, 69% of insurers, and 81% of technology vendors. In a survey spanning over eight months, Black Book captured a sweeping spectrum of insight into the tentative progress of health information exchange and true interoperability, polling nearly 2,000 health plan members/patients, 800 independent and employed physicians, 700 hospital executives, 1,200 insurers, and 500 health information technology vendor staffers.
“Although the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT recently released a draft detailing a ten-year nationwide road map for basic health record connectivity by 2017, fewer and more specifically defined interoperability objectives are needed to focus stakeholders to prevent the technology industry from backing further away from HIE initiatives,” said Doug Brown, Managing Partner of the nationwide study, Black Book Research.
Some simple healthcare information is being exchanged among parallel EHR systems in pockets of communities but Black Book reports that 94% of America’s providers, healthcare agencies, patients and payers persist as meaningfully unconnected in Q1 2015. Outside of their garden walled EHR networks, providers are dropping HIE as a priority, as evidenced by a 5% drop in regional connectivity from last year.
The Black Book survey shows that providers are retreating from complex HIE endeavors, due, in part, to the flawed business models of public HIES and the waiting game to see if payers foot the bill for significant data sharing mechanisms, according to 90 percent of hospital organizations and 94 percent of independent physicians.
Stakeholders also forecast the evolution and expansion of payer-owned and private network vendors and the contraction of the public HIE vendor market.
“A short list of enterprise HIE vendors have effectively established operative exchanges across organizational siloes to benefit patients, providers, agencies and payers,” said Brown. “Those vendors are justifiably earning the lion’s share of 2015 initiatives and stymied HIE developers are reconsidering their positions.”
72 percent of HIE stakeholders (hospitals, insurers, physicians, labs, and pharmacies) predict the demise of most small, independent HIE developers by 2017, particularly those that have not proven operative to the government payer and commercial insurance sectors, and those HIEs not owned or acquired by the major insurers by then.
In 2014, 70% of surveyed health insurers rejected participation in public HIEs. Trust has surged in payer-owned HIEs as well as in data sharing networks developed by HIE vendors for payer groups following a year of resolving data ownership and accountability issues, according to 86 percent of provider respondents, up from 40% in 2013.
"Payers are determining how they can best manage the HIE ecosystem by gaining access to the clinical data of covered members", said Brown. "With the nearly 90% of urban hospitals and medical practices functional with EHR, reciprocal data flow with payers has been the tipping point to provoke insurers to initiate the leadership roles in HIEs."
Additionally, 90 percent of providers and 98 percent of payers agree that payers will fill an information gap for clinicians at the point of eligibility, and will allow them to administer better care via access to aggregated data on members, according to survey results.
"Providers are simply not benefiting financially yet from HIE development. Without proven worth or certain return, the shift to payer investment in private HIEs was inevitable with value-based care emerging", said Brown.
The stakeholders that benefit the most from connectivity are the ones that will pay to support exchanges, and they will drive the most successful initiatives going forward.”
“As risk sharing increases, so will the demand for meaningful, robust data sharing between providers and payers regardless of the EHR employed. “ Brown added. “If the interfaces for interoperability between the HIE and stakeholders is too difficult to evaluate and analyze risk, the more likely we will see another round of EHR replacements.”
HIE measures of success are clearly charted by Black Book. The crowdsourcing surveyors polled users of 224 operational exchanges and 67 HIE vendors, both public and private, to determine the top performing vendors on twenty HIE-specific gages.
Current users ranked four HIE vendors as top performers in their specialty theatres of engagement. Ranking first in their respective categories in the interoperability marketplace for 2014 are:
Cerner –Electronic Health Record-based HIE
Orion Health– Government Payer and Commercial Insurer Centric HIEs
Aetna Medicity – Core Private Enterprise HIE Solutions
Intersystems –Core Public HIEs Systems
Other vendors scored well in specific key HIE performance indicators were: Alere Wellogic, Availity, Caradigm, CTG, dbMotion Allscripts, Epic Systems, Greenway, GSI Healthcare, HealthUnity, ICA, Infor (Lawson), McKesson RelayHealth, Medecision, Optuminsightt, QSI Mirth NextGen, Sandlot, and Siemens.
Other notable Black Book HIE survey findings include:
In 2015, 72 percent of multi-provider networks and hospital systems are considering private HIEs for standardized sharing of patient data. In 2013, this figure was 33 percent.
98 percent of healthcare organizations believed in 2013 that private, community/regional HIEs were the preferred choice to comprehensively achieve Accountable Care Organization deliverables. This remains unchanged in 2015.
99 percent of providers in 2013 agreed that payers needed to reward providers for HIE utilization that lead to tangible reduction in readmissions, elimination of duplicate diagnostic testing, and decreasing episodes of care. This figure is consistent also in 2015.
In 2013, 82 percent of all payers and 60 percent of hospitals agreed that an operational national HIE is at least a decade off. In 2015, 91 percent of all payers and 94 percent of providers believe that a robust, meaningful national HIE will now be achievable by 2025.
About Black Book™
Black Book Rankings, a division of Black Book Market Research LLC, provides healthcare decision makers, IT users, media, investors, analysts, quality minded vendors, and prospective software system buyers, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and other interested sectors of the clinical technology industry with comprehensive comparison data of the industry's top respected and competitively performing technology and managed services vendors in the sector.
The largest user opinion poll of its kind in healthcare IT, Black Book™ collects over 400,000 viewpoints on information technology and outsourced services vendor performance annually. For methodology, auditing, resources, comprehensive research and ranking data, see http://www.www.blackbookmarketresearch.com
PDF-
Print
